The Nature of God: A Manifestational Monotheism Perspective

By SeekNKnow

Introduction

This article presents my view on the nature of God—a view I have come to call Manifestational Monotheism. It attempts to bridge the gaps left by classical Trinitarian models and Modalistic theories, presenting a coherent, Scripture-rooted understanding of how the One True God reveals Himself to humanity. My aim is not to invent a new religion or movement, but to explore every theological angle honestly, humbly, and logically, while remaining faithful to the text of Scripture.

Core Belief

I believe that God is one singular Being who manifests Himself in distinct, simultaneous, relational expressions—not "persons" in the philosophical sense, and not successive roles or modes. These manifestations are distinct in function and expression, yet unified in essence. The clearest metaphor I use is that of a cube, where each face is unique, but part of the same object. Over time, I have identified five distinct manifestations, though the position itself is structured to allow for more—should they meet clear and scripturally grounded criteria. This openness suggests that a shape more complex than a cube may ultimately be required to represent the fullness of God's nature.

The Primary Manifestations

• God the Father – The eternal source and sovereign authority.
• God the Son (Jesus Christ) – The physical and incarnate manifestation of God.
• God the Holy Spirit – The internal, empowering presence of God in the believer.
• God the Church (Universal) – The spiritual Body and Bride of Christ, joined with Him.
• God the Word (Logos) – The eternal communicative, creative expression of God.

These are distinct manifestations of the same unified Divine Being—not separate beings, not temporary modes, and not philosophical abstractions.

While I have explored the idea of Wisdom as a manifestation, I currently view it instead as a core attribute—a foundational divine characteristic expressed through all manifestations of God. Wisdom is present in the Father's will, the Son's actions, the Spirit's guidance, the Word's revelation, and the Church's obedience. It is not a separate face, but the divine thread running through every expression of God's nature.

Scriptural Foundations

• Monotheism: Deut. 6:4, Isaiah 44:6
• Jesus as God: John 14:9, Col. 2:9, John 1:14
• The Spirit as God: 1 Cor. 3:16, Rom. 8:11
• The Word as God: John 1:1-3, Ps. 33:6
• Wisdom as Divine Characteristic: Prov. 8:22-30, 1 Cor. 1:24
• The Church as the Body of Christ: Eph. 1:22-23, John 17:21

Comparative Chart

Attribute / View	Nicene Trinitarianism	Modalism (Sabellianism)	Oneness Pentecostalism	Manifestational Monotheism (This View)
Number of Beings	One Being, Three Persons	One Being, Three Modes	One Being, One Person	One Being, Multiple Manifestations
Distinction	Co-equal persons	Temporal roles	Functional roles	Simultaneous expressions of One God
Jesus’ Identity	2nd person of the Trinity	Same as Father in new mode	Father in flesh	Physical manifestation of the One True God
Holy Spirit	3rd person of Trinity	Father in spiritual mode	Jesus’ spiritual role	Indwelling presence of God
The Church	Body of Christ	Not divine	Spirit-filled community	Manifestation of God’s work and presence
The Word	Identified with Son	Folded into Son	Jesus	Eternal manifestation—distinct and creative
Wisdom	Attribute of God	Not discussed	Not emphasized	Shared divine characteristic across manifestations
Simultaneity of Expressions	Yes	No	Sometimes	Yes
Risk of Tritheism	Moderate	None	Low	None
Risk of Modalism	None	High	Moderate	Low

Strengths of This View

• Solves Trinitarian Tensions: Maintains divine unity without dividing God into separate "persons."
• Allows Simultaneity: Baptism of Jesus makes sense—manifestations act concurrently.
• Explains OT Theophanies: The Angel of the Lord fits easily as a pre-incarnate manifestation.
• Accounts for the Church's Role: Doesn’t relegate the Church to a passive role but as a living, Spirit-filled expression of God’s ongoing work.
• Affirms the Word and Wisdom: Integrates Scripture’s broader personified expressions of God into the divine identity without elevating them into separate entities.

Potential Shortfalls and Critiques

• Lack of Historical Creedal Support: This view doesn't line up neatly with the Nicene or Chalcedonian Creeds, which may concern traditionalists. However, one could argue that the Early Church Fathers did not always articulate a fixed doctrine of the Trinity in the earliest centuries. For example, Tertullian spoke of the 'economy' of God in ways that align with roles or expressions, and Justin Martyr often described Christ as the Logos—distinct in function, yet one in essence with the Father. The Didache and other pre-Nicene writings focus more on lived faith and unity of God than philosophical categories. This leaves space for models like Manifestational Monotheism to operate within historical orthodoxy while challenging creedal rigidity.
• Scriptures Suggesting Relational Distinction: John 17:5, John 1:1-2, Matthew 3:16-17 may suggest a deeper relational plurality than the “face of the cube” model allows. However, these distinctions can also be seen as internal relational dynamics within God’s unified Being, visible to us through His manifestations.

Apologetic Advantage:

• This view defends the simplicity of monotheism found in Deut. 6:4 without importing post-biblical philosophical categories.
• It avoids the logical tensions of co-equal personhood while preserving functional and relational plurality.
• Isaiah 9:6 refers to the Messiah as both "Everlasting Father" and "Mighty God," strongly implying a unified divine identity rather than distinct beings.
• It restores Scriptural primacy over creedal tradition, making it more accessible to those disillusioned with doctrinal complexity but committed to Biblical authority.

Conclusion

Manifestational Monotheism offers a bold but biblically grounded alternative to both Trinitarianism and Modalism Isaiah 45:5 Isaiah 45:5. It affirms the oneness of God, respects the relational and simultaneous expressions seen throughout Scripture, and allows space for deeper, nuanced expressions like The Word. It’s not a rejection of tradition, but a refinement based on careful, contextual exegesis and an honest desire to know God more clearly.

While the metaphor of the cube has served as a helpful starting point—symbolizing distinct, visible faces of a unified being—I fully recognize its limitations. A more accurate and theologically rich metaphor might be the hypercube (or tesseract). This higher-dimensional geometric shape captures the dynamic, multi-faceted nature of God in ways the cube cannot. It allows for manifestations that are not always visible or comprehensible from a limited, human perspective, while maintaining structural unity (1 Cor. 13:12) (1 Cor. 13:12).

The hypercube model opens up room for considering scripturally grounded divine expressions that are not separate beings but are still distinct in tone, role, and relational function. These may include:

• Attributes like Wisdom, which permeates all other manifestations Prov. 8:1 Prov. 8:1
• Titles like The Word, The Name of God, or The Angel of the Lord Rev. 19:13 Rev. 19:13
• Manifesting signs like the Shekinah Glory Ex. 24:16–17 Ex. 24:16–17
• Prophetic symbols such as the Lamb, Lion of Judah, or Branch Rev. 5:6 Rev. 5:6
• Divine names like YHWH, El Shaddai, Jehovah, Emmanuel, Yeshua, and even Jealous Ex. 3:14–15 Ex. 3:14–15

Rather than assigning these to new “faces,” the hypercube metaphor allows these expressions to occupy overlapping dimensional relationships with the five core manifestations. They may be sub-manifestations, contextual forms, or theological reflections of a manifestation depending on God’s purpose in revelation.

If God truly is infinite, then our metaphors must remain open to refinement. Whether cube, hypercube, or something yet undiscovered—His nature is unified, eternal, and wondrously multi-faceted.